Loading…
Solution
Servers and storage sized against your real workload, virtualised properly, backed up, and tested by actually restoring — not by reading a green tick.
The approach
Server projects usually go wrong in one of two places. Either the machine was sized from a template rather than the workload, and it is slow within eighteen months. Or the backup was configured, reported success for two years, and could not be restored on the day it mattered.
We size from evidence: current utilisation, database growth rate, concurrent user pattern, the specific behaviour of your ERP or Tally deployment. Then we build it — RAID layout, hypervisor, out-of-band management, firmware baseline — and hand over as-built documentation rather than a pile of boxes.
Backup is treated as part of the server, not an accessory. We design to a stated recovery point and recovery time objective, and we test the restore on a schedule. Anything less is an assumption dressed up as a control.
Capabilities
Specifics rather than adjectives. If something you need is not here, ask — this is a list of what we do routinely, not a limit.
Core count, memory, IOPS and network sized from measured utilisation and growth, with headroom stated explicitly rather than hidden.
VMware, Hyper-V or Proxmox. Consolidating five ageing physical servers onto two hosts usually pays for the project in power, licensing and support alone.
3-2-1 backup design with defined RPO and RTO, off-site or cloud copy, immutable retention where ransomware is a concern, and scheduled restore tests.
NAS and SAN for file services, virtualisation datastores, backup targets and long-retention surveillance archive.
Racks, UPS with correct runtime, PDUs, earthing, cooling assessment and cable management. The unglamorous work that determines whether the room is maintainable.
Cutovers scheduled in your quiet window, with a documented rollback at every stage. We plan for the migration failing, which is why they generally do not.
Questions
Straight answers, including where the answer is that you should spend less.
Sometimes. For a Tally or ERP workload with predictable load and a five-year horizon, on-premise is usually cheaper. For variable workloads, remote-first teams or anything needing geographic resilience, cloud wins. We will model both against your numbers and tell you which — including when the answer is that you should not buy from us.
Quarterly as standard under AMC, monthly for critical systems. Each test produces a written report with the actual recovery time achieved, not just a pass mark.
Yes, after a discovery visit. We document what is there, list the risks we find, and give you a remediation plan before taking on support — we will not sign an SLA over a configuration we have not inspected.
Sector context
Other pillars
Most clients combine two or three. There is no requirement to take everything to get a fair price on part of it.
Tell us the constraint you are working against — a site, a budget, a deadline, an audit finding — and we will tell you what is realistic.